Tyler Pipe v. Washington Department of Revenue
United States Supreme Court
483 U.S. 232 (1987)
- Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD
Facts
Washington state imposed a business and occupation tax (B&O tax) on business activities in the state, including extracting raw materials, manufacturing, wholesale sales, and retail sales, pursuant to Washington Revenue Code 82.04.220 (1985). The sales tax was measured by the gross proceeds of sales, and the manufacturing tax was measured by the value of manufactured products. Typically, Washington imposed the same taxes on different activities. The B&O tax included an exemption from the manufacturing tax for the portion of the manufacturer’s output that was subject to the wholesale tax. Consequently, the wholesale tax applied to out-of-state manufacturers, but not to local manufacturers. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. (Tyler) (plaintiff) sued the Washington Department of Revenue (defendant) challenging the B&O tax under the Commerce Clause. The superior court upheld the B&O tax, and the Washington Supreme Court affirmed. The United States Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.