Tyler v. Hillsdale County Sheriff’s Department
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
775 F.3d 308 (2014)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Clifford Tyler (plaintiff) was committed to a mental institution for one month after an emotionally traumatic divorce. Approximately 30 years later, Tyler attempted to purchase a firearm. Tyler’s purchase was denied because a federal law prohibited a person from possessing a firearm if the person had ever been (1) adjudicated as a mental defective or (2) committed to a mental institution. The law’s purpose was to prevent mentally ill people from committing suicide or acts of violence toward others. The law specifically allowed a person to regain the right to possess a firearm by obtaining an official ruling that the person was not dangerous. However, the federal program for restoring firearm-possession rights was not operative because it was not funded. Although Congress had provided incentives for states to implement rights-restoration programs, only some states had created these programs. Tyler lived in Michigan, which did not have a program for restoring firearm-possession rights. Therefore, although Tyler had evidence indicating that he was not dangerous and had not been mentally ill for decades, he had no access to either a federal or a state program that could restore his firearm-possession rights. Tyler sued, alleging that the federal law violated his Second Amendment rights. The district court dismissed Tyler’s suit for failure to state a claim, and Tyler appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Boggs, J.)
Concurrence (Gibbons, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Related Videos
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.
