Tyler v. Michaels Stores

984 N.E.2d 737 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tyler v. Michaels Stores

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
984 N.E.2d 737 (2013)

Facts

On several occasions, when Melissa Tyler (plaintiff) used her credit card to pay for purchases at Michaels Stores, Inc. (Michaels) (defendant), the clerk asked Tyler for her zip code. Believing that the information was necessary to complete the credit-card transaction, Tyler gave the clerk her zip-code information, and the clerk entered it into a digital credit-card form. However, Tyler’s zip code was not necessary to complete the credit transaction. Instead, Michaels asked for the information because it could use the combination of the consumer’s name and zip code to locate the consumer’s telephone number and address—and then send unsolicited marketing materials to the consumer. Tyler did not want any marketing materials, but she received some from Michaels anyway. Tyler filed a class-action lawsuit against Michaels in federal court, alleging that its practice of gathering unnecessary personal information during credit-card transactions violated a state unfair-competition law. The district court found that Tyler had alleged a violation of the law, but that she had not alleged an actionable injury. Specifically, the district court found that the law was meant only to protect against identity fraud and identity injuries, not to protect a consumer’s privacy. Because Tyler had not suffered any identity injuries, the district court dismissed Tyler’s claims. However, the district court then certified questions about the state unfair-competition law to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, seeking clarification about what constituted a violation and what injuries would support a claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Botsford, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership