Tyson v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.
North Carolina Court of Appeals
347 S.E.2d 473 (1986)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
Upton Tyson (plaintiff) was a farmer. Tyson explained to Farm Chemical (defendant) that Tyson wanted to plant no-till soybeans and needed an herbicide. Tyson requested herbicides called Lasso and Lorox, but Farm Chemical suggested a cheaper herbicide called Dual 8E. Farm Chemical said that Dual 8E would “do a good job.” Dual 8E was manufactured by Ciba-Geigy Corp. (Ciba) (defendant). The Dual 8E herbicide did not kill Tyson’s weeds, and Tyson had a poor soybean harvest. Tyson sued Farm Chemical and Ciba for breach of express warranty and the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. The trial court dismissed both claims, and Tyson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hedrick, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.