Tzolis v. Wolff
Court of Appeals of New York
884 N.E.2d 1005 (2008)
- Written by John Caddell, JD
Facts
Pennington Property Co., LLC (PPC) owned an apartment building in Manhattan. PPC’s managers (defendants) allegedly colluded with others to lease and later sell the building for less than fair market value. The plaintiffs collectively own a 25 percent share of PPC. They sued individually and on behalf of PPC seeking, among other things, to void the sale and terminate the lease. The trial court dismissed the complaint, ruling that the plaintiffs could not sue individually because the wrongs alleged were suffered by PPC; and that they could not sue on behalf of PPC because New York law does not permit LLC derivative actions. The appellate court reversed, finding that New York law does permit derivative actions by members on behalf of LLCs. The defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.