U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
USDA Food and Nutrition Service
65 Fed. Reg. 10856 (2000)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
In 1995, the US Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service (DAFNS) published a final rule amending 7 U.S.C. § 2014(g)(5), which required state agencies to create standards for identifying “inaccessible resources,” defined as those resources that the household is unable to sell for any significant return. Such resources may be excluded from the financial-resource calculation for food-stamp eligibility determinations. The secretary of the DAFNS had further determined that the inaccessible-resource provision did not apply to vehicles. When the amended rule was challenged via prior litigation, courts deferred to the secretary’s interpretation of the statute, finding that the interpretation was reasonable while at the same time acknowledging that it was not the only possible interpretation. Because the statutory provisions conferred upon the secretary the discretion to determine whether vehicles constitute inaccessible resources, DAFNS chose in February 2000 to propose policy changes that would address some of the instances of inequity resulting from application of the interpretation. DAFNS acknowledged that to help low-income individuals achieve self-sufficiency, the vehicle-ownership policy must not be so rigid. DAFNS considered the importance of owning a vehicle while seeking or retaining employment and noted that the secretary’s strict interpretation might require an individual to choose between owning a reliable mode of transportation to work or sacrificing the vehicle to maintain food-stamp eligibility. Even vehicles of modest value owned by most low-income households could not be excluded from the financial-resource calculation under the amended rule. To combat these potentially unfair outcomes, the provisions of the proposed rule change would (1) completely exclude a vehicle from the resource test if the vehicle was necessary for producing income or transporting a disabled household member, used as a home, or fit the definition of an inaccessible resource likely to produce less than $1,000 or $1,500 after a sale, depending on the applicable household limit; (2) subject any vehicles used for employment purposes, plus one vehicle no matter the intended use, to the fair market value test only; and (3) subject any additional vehicles to a dual test, counting towards a household’s financial resources the higher of the fair market value exceeding $4,650 or the equity value.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.