U.S. Sporting Products, Inc. v. Johnny Stewart Game Calls, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals
865 S.W.2d 214 (1993)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Johnny Stewart Game Calls, Inc. (Game Calls) (defendant) recorded animal calls by either tracking and recording animals in the wild or by capturing animals and recording their sounds in captivity. The recordings were time and labor intensive. Game Calls sold tapes of their recordings to hunters and photographers to use as sound lures. United States Sporting Products, Inc. (Sporting Products) (plaintiff) copied 19 of Game Calls’ animal sound recordings and sold tapes containing the copied recordings to customers in direct competition with Game Calls. Sporting Products refused to stop selling the copied sounds despite repeated requests from Game Calls. Game Calls sued Sporting Products for misappropriation. After a jury trial, the trial court awarded Game Calls actual and exemplary damages and ordered Sporting Products to stop selling tapes containing Game Calls’ recordings. Sporting Products appealed, arguing that (1) Game Calls’ recordings were available for public use because the recordings were not copyrighted and Game Calls published the recordings; (2) misappropriation applied only to current news items, not animal sound recordings; and (3) misappropriation claims were only entitled to equitable relief, not monetary damages.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Vance, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.