From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...
U.S. v. Nosal
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
676 F.3d 854 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc)
Facts
David Nosal (defendant) worked for Korn/Ferry International, a corporate executive-search firm. After leaving, Nosal convinced former colleagues to access the company’s proprietary database and send him information to start a competing business. Korn/Ferry had authorized the employees to access the database, but company policy prohibited disclosing confidential information to outsiders. Nosal was indicted on multiple charges, including aiding and abetting Korn/Ferry employees violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) by exceeding their authorized access. Nosal moved to dismiss, arguing the CFAA applied to hackers who accessed data without authorization, not employees authorized to access Korn/Ferry’s computers and database. The court dismissed the CFAA charges. The government (plaintiff) appealed, arguing the statute applied to any use of information that exceeded the employees’ authorized access.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kozinski, C.J.)
Dissent (Silverman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.