Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
U

U.S. v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corporation

411 U.S. 655 (1973)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

U.S. v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corporation

United States Supreme Court
411 U.S. 655 (1973)

CS

Facts

Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corporation (PICCO) (defendant) was prosecuted for violating waterway-pollution provisions of Section 13 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. § 407. In addition to raising other issues regarding the applicability of the statute, PICCO claimed that it had been affirmatively misled by the regulations promulgated by the responsible administrative agency to believe that its conduct was not criminal. The district court rejected this argument, and PICCO was convicted. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s holding that Section 13 did apply to PICCO’s conduct but reversed the conviction on multiple grounds, including that the responsible administrative agency had failed to set up a permit program for this type of conduct and also that the district court had erred in rejecting PICCO’s claim that it had been affirmatively misled by the regulations. The court of appeals therefore reversed PICCO’s conviction and remanded the case so that PICCO’s claim regarding its reliance on the misleading regulations could be presented. The prosecution (plaintiff) petitioned for certiorari, and the United States Supreme Court granted the request.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Blackmun, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Burger, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Criminal Law

Key Terms