U-Series International Services, Ltd. v. United States

1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16562 (1995)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

U-Series International Services, Ltd. v. United States

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16562 (1995)

SC

Facts

The United States Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) (defendant) seized electronics owned by U-Series International Services, Ltd. (U-Series) (plaintiff) because the DEA believed that U-Series was laundering money for drug traffickers. The DEA instituted forfeiture proceedings against U-Series, led by DEA agent William Snider (defendant). U-Series sued the DEA and Snider for violations of its Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights. Specifically, U-Series claimed that (1) the government’s forfeiture notice was inadequate in violation of U-Series’ due-process rights; (2) the seizure amounted to unlawful conversion, invoking the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA); and (3) Snider was individually liable for the alleged Fifth Amendment violation under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics. U-Series did not seek money damages but only a return of the electronics. The DEA and Snider moved for summary judgment on all claims, asserting sovereign and qualified immunity.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mukasey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership