Uhlaender v. Henricksen

316 F. Supp. 1277 (1970)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Uhlaender v. Henricksen

United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
316 F. Supp. 1277 (1970)

Facts

Theodore Otto Uhlaender (plaintiff) was a professional baseball player. Keith and Kent Henricksen (defendants) owned a company called Negamco that published tabletop games based on baseball that included the names and game statistics for more than 500 major league baseball players. Uhlaender filed suit against the Henricksens and Negamco on behalf of himself and other similarly situated professional baseball players. Uhlaender claimed that the Henricksens and Negamco had misappropriated the names of the major league baseball players for profit and without paying royalties. The Henricksens and Negamco argued that Uhlaender’s cause of action should be considered an invasion-of-right-of-privacy claim and that Uhlaender’s case must therefore fail because the names and statistics were not used in a demeaning or offensive manner, all the information used was public knowledge, and the game provided publicity for the baseball players.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Neville, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 781,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership