UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
667 F.3d 1022 (2011)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Veoh Networks (Veoh) (defendant) was an internet service provider (ISP) that operated a publicly accessible music-sharing website. Users could upload and share their own user-created music. In addition, Veoh had an agreement with a prominent holder of music copyrights, SonyBMG, that allowed for sharing of SonyBMG’s copyrighted music videos. Unauthorized sharing of music videos also occurred on Veoh because users could share music for which the copyright holder was Universal Music Group (UMG) (plaintiff), and UMG had not consented to the music sharing. News articles reported on the issue of UMG’s copyrighted materials being available on Veoh, a problem that Veoh acknowledged. Veoh implemented measures to deter copyright infringement, but the issue persisted. It was undisputed that whenever UMG formally notified Veoh of infringing activity, Veoh expeditiously removed the specific content or disabled access to it. Veoh did not otherwise have a practice of affirmatively investigating whether users were authorized to share specific content. UMG sued Veoh for copyright infringement. On summary judgment, Veoh argued that it was protected by a statutory safe harbor as an ISP pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 512(c). The district court agreed and granted summary judgment to Veoh. UMG appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fisher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.