UNCITRAL CLOUT Case 423
Austria Supreme Court of Justice
10 Ob 223/99x (1999)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
An Italian seller of hiking shoes (the seller) (plaintiff) delivered contracted goods to an Austrian dealer (the buyer) (defendant), which in turn directly resold the shoes to a Scandinavian company. About three weeks after the delivery, the buyer notified the seller of defects that had allegedly not been detectable upon initial inspection. The seller refused to take back the shoes, which were a seasonable product, and demanded payment. The buyer responded that the goods did not conform to the contract and that the seller’s damages should be offset. The seller sued the buyer for payment. The trial court ruled in the seller’s favor, finding that the buyer could not rely on the goods’ lack of conformity because the buyer did not give timely notice of breach under the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). An appellate court reversed and remanded. The Supreme Court reviewed the matter.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.