UNCITRAL CLOUT Case 534
Austria Supreme Court of Justice
7Ob 275/03x (2003)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
An Austrian buyer and a Hong Kong-based seller concluded a sales contract that had been negotiated and written in English. Pursuant to the contract, the buyer submitted a sale order that referred to the buyer’s general terms of contract, which were printed on the back of the order form in German. The terms subsequently gave rise to a dispute that was litigated in Austrian courts in accordance with the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). The trial court and an intermediate appellate court held that the buyer’s general terms of contract were inoperative because they were written in a language other than that in which the contract was negotiated and drafted. The buyer appealed to Austria’s supreme court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.