Underhill v. Hernandez
United States Supreme Court
168 U.S. 250 (1897)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
George Underhill (plaintiff), a United States citizen, built a water system for and supplied water to the City of Bolivar, Venezuela, pursuant to a contract signed with the government. General Hernandez (defendant) organized a coup and overthrew the government. The United States soon recognized Hernandez’s faction as the rightful government of Venezuela. After Hernandez overtook the City of Bolivar, Underhill applied to Hernandez for a passport to leave the country. Hernandez initially denied the request. Several days later, Hernandez granted the request, and Underhill returned to the United States. Underhill sued Hernandez in United States federal court, alleging an illegal detention. The court of appeals ruled that the court did not have jurisdiction over the case, because it was an act of a foreign government on its own soil. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fuller, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.