Logourl black

Unico v. Owen

Supreme Court of New Jersey
232 A.2d 405 (1967)


Facts

On November 6, 1952, James Owen (Owen) (defendant) agreed to purchase 140 records from Universal Stereo Corporation (Universal) for $698. Owen was to pay monthly installments and signed a promissory note to that effect. The signed promissory note was immediately assigned to Unico (plaintiff). This was a typical practice for Universal because Unico was specifically created to finance Universal. Unico participated in setting the standards of the sales agreements between Universal and prospective purchasers. After signing the sales agreement with Universal, Owen paid the monthly installments for 12 months until Universal stopped delivering records. In July 1964, Unico informed Owen that Unico held Owen’s promissory note and Owen was to pay Unico regardless of Universal’s failure to deliver the records. Owen refused and Unico sued. The trial court held that because of Unico’s extension participation in creating the sales agreement between Universal and Owen, Unico was not a holder in due course and subject to Owen’s defenses. The court of appeals affirmed. Unico appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Francis, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.