Unilever Italia SpA v. Central Food SpA
European Union Court of Justice
E.C.J. Case C-443/98, 2000 E.C.R. I-7535 (2000)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
Unilever Italian SpA (Unilever) (plaintiff) entered into a contract to sell olive oil to Central Food SpA (Central Food) (defendant). Central Food informed Unilever that the olive oil delivered to Central Food by Unilever was improperly labeled under Italian law, and Central Food refused to pay Unilever for the shipment. Unilever sued Central Food for breach of contract in an Italian court. Unilever argued that the Italian law governing the labeling of olive oil was not applicable because the adoption of the law violated a European Union (EU) directive on the adoption of new laws governing technical standards by member states. To facilitate the marketing of goods throughout the EU, an EU directive required member states to provide the European Commission (the commission) with a draft of any regulation involving technical standards and to postpone the adoption into law of any such draft legislation until three months after the commission had received the draft. Italy adopted a law governing the labeling of olive oil without postponing the adoption of the law as required under the EU directive. The case was brought before an Italian court, and the court asked the European Union Court of Justice to issue a preliminary ruling on whether the EU directive could be invoked in a civil case involving private parties concerning contractual obligations.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.