Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Union National Bank v. Lamb

United States Supreme Court
337 U.S. 38 (1949)


Facts

In 1927, Union National Bank (Union National) (plaintiff) obtained a judgment against Carl Lamb (defendant) in a Colorado court. Lamb never paid the judgment. In 1945, Union National revived the Colorado judgment by obtaining personal service upon Lamb in Missouri. Shortly thereafter, Union National filed an action in Missouri state court to recover on the revived Colorado judgment. Because the judgment was originally won in Colorado, Union National argued that the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution obligated the Missouri court to use Colorado’s rule for reviving judgments. Lamb argued that Missouri law applied and barred enforcement of any judgment more than 10 years old. Lamb claimed that because Union National did not revive the Colorado judgment within 10 years of its rendition in 1927, Union National could not recover on the Colorado judgment in Missouri court. The trial court agreed with Lamb and dismissed Union National’s suit. Union National appealed. The Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed, holding that the Full Faith and Credit Clause did not require Missouri to recognize Colorado’s longer statute of limitations with respect to reviving judgments. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.