Union Paving Co. to Use of United States Casualty Co. v. Thomas

186 F.2d 172 (1951)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Union Paving Co. to Use of United States Casualty Co. v. Thomas

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
186 F.2d 172 (1951)

RW

Facts

Union Paving Company (plaintiff) was the general contractor for a road project. Thomas (codefendant) was Union Paving’s subcontractor. The subcontracting agreement contained a no-fault blanket provision obligating Thomas to indemnify Union Paving for any losses arising from Thomas’s work, regardless of whether any negligence on Thomas’s part occasioned the loss. Thomas was insured by United States Casualty Company (the insurer) (codefendant). The insurance policy expressly did not apply to liability Thomas assumed under any contract or agreement not listed in the policy. Although the policy contained a detailed endorsement covering Thomas’s work for Union Paving at a sewage disposal plant, no such endorsement covered the road project. During the course of Thomas’s subcontracting work on this project, a motorist drove into one of Thomas’s excavations. The motorist successfully sued Union Paving for improperly supervising Thomas’s work, and recovered damages. Union Paving sued Thomas to indemnify it for the damages. Thomas brought the insurer into the case. When the federal district court dismissed the insurer as a defendant, Thomas appealed to the Third Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McLaughlin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership