Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

United Air Lines, Inc. v Austin Travel Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
867 F.2d 737 (1989)


Facts

United Air Lines, Inc. (United) (plaintiff) owns and operates a computerized reservation system (CRS) called “Apollo” and a business and accounting system known as “Apollo Business System” (ABS). United leased Austin Travel Corp. (Austin) is a travel agency that operates multiple offices in New York. Austin leased Apollo and ABS from United for use in four of Austin’s offices. Austin used a competitor CRS program in its other offices. Each of Austin’s leases from United was governed by a separate contract containing a provision providing for the payment of liquidated damages upon premature termination of the contract. Specifically, if Austin terminated its contracts with United early, Austin would be required to pay eighty percent of the remaining fixed monthly fees due under the contract; eighty percent of any variable charges for the month preceding termination, multiplied by the number of months remaining in the contract term; and fifty percent of the average revenue from monthly booking fees charged to customers using Apollo to book reservations with Apollo, multiplied by the number of months remaining in the contract term. In June 1986, Austin breached its contracts with United by adopting a competitor CRS system before expiration of its Apollo and ABS contracts. United brought suit in federal district court against Austin alleging breach of contract and claiming liquidated damages. Austin defended and counterclaimed on the ground that the liquidated damages clauses in its Apollo and ABS contracts were unenforceable penalties. The trial court upheld the liquidated damages provisions and awarded $408,375 in liquidated damages to United. Austin appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Miner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 121,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.