United Airlines, Inc. v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania

439 F.3d 128 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United Airlines, Inc. v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
439 F.3d 128 (2006)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD

Facts

On September 11, 2001, hijacked airplanes flew into the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia. United Air Lines, Inc.’s (United) (plaintiff) ticket office in the World Trade Center was destroyed. United’s facilities at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport were not physically damaged. All air traffic in the country was halted prior to the Pentagon attack, and, fearing future local attacks, Reagan airport remained shut down for several extra weeks. United received $782 million in federal aid but had $400 million remaining in unreimbursed losses. United had a $25 million business-interruption insurance policy with Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ISOP) (defendant) covering terrorism-related property damage, lost earnings, and extra expenses. The policy insured against lost earnings from (1) damage to insured’s property and (2) for up to two weeks, inability to access insured’s property when prohibited by civil order due to damage to adjacent premises. The policy had another provision that United deemed the suppression-damages clause, which covered other damage caused by government efforts to suppress or minimize the consequences of terrorism. United filed a declaratory judgment and breach-of-contract suit seeking recovery for losses related to the national disruption of flight service and the shutdown of Reagan airport. The district court denied United’s claim, finding that the policy excluded losses unrelated to physical damage to United’s property or to physical damage to an adjacent property. United appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sack, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership