United Association of Journeymen v. Myers

488 F. Supp. 704 (1980)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United Association of Journeymen v. Myers

United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
488 F. Supp. 704 (1980)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In 1936, Edward Myers and Opal Myers (defendant) married. Edward worked in the plumbing industry and belonged to a plumbing and pipefitting union (the union). In 1954, Edward and Opal divorced. In 1963, Edward’s union created a pension plan for union members (the pension plan) (plaintiff). The union retroactively credited Edward with 15 years of participation in the pension plan. In 1973, Edward married Margaret Myers (defendant). In 1973 and 1976, Edward retired and died, respectively. The pension plan began paying survivor’s benefits to Margaret until Opal claimed an entitlement to a fraction of the benefits. Opal argued that a portion of the proceeds belonged to the Edward–Opal marital community because the pension plan was based on six years of community labor. The pension plan brought a declaratory-judgment action to resolve the dispute.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parker, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership