United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners v. Scott
United States Supreme Court
463 U.S. 825, 103 S. Ct. 3352, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1049 (1983)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
A.A. Cross Construction Company, Inc. (Cross) (plaintiff) entered into a contract to complete a building project in Texas. Cross hired both union and nonunion workers for the project. Local members of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners (union) (defendant) staged several violent, planned protests at the construction site and warned Cross employees that the violence would continue until the nonunion workers either quit or joined the union. The protests delayed the construction project and ultimately caused Cross to default on its contract. Cross and several of its employees (plaintiffs) sued the union pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3), alleging that union members had engaged in a conspiracy to deprive Cross employees of their constitutionally protected rights because of their nonunion status. The district court found that Cross had met the § 1985(3) class-animus requirement by proving that the protests were motivated by an economic bias against nonunion workers. The court of appeals affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.