United Companies Lending Corp. v. Sargeant
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
20 F. Supp. 2d 192 (1998)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
United Companies Lending Corporation (United) (plaintiff) made mortgage-secured subprime loans to homebuyers. To cover the risks associated with subprime loans, other lenders typically charged borrowers 5 percent (five points) of the loan amount as a loan-origination fee. United covered its risks not only by issuing adjustable-rate mortgages, but by charging 10 points. Daisy Sargeant (defendant) was one of United's borrowers. United's broker failed to fully disclose what fees and points Sargeant had to pay to obtain her loan. When Sargeant fell behind in making payments on the loan, United initiated foreclosure proceedings, and later invoked diversity jurisdiction to remove the case to federal court. Sargeant contended that United's high-points policy constituted an unfair and deceptive lending practice. Massachusetts law defined such practices as mortgage-loan interest rates or terms that "significantly deviate from industry-wide standards or which are otherwise unconscionable." United argued that it could not compete with other lenders unless it either raised subprime-loan interest rates or charged high points, and that competitive market forces ensured fairness in providing mortgage-secured loans.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Young, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.