United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh v. Carey

430 U.S. 144 (1977)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh v. Carey

United States Supreme Court
430 U.S. 144 (1977)

  • Written by Philip Glass, JD
Play video

Facts

Approximately 30,000 Hasidic Jews called Bedford-Stuyvesant home. This cohesive religious minority inhabited one assembly and one senate district in 1972. The senate district was 37 percent racial minority. By contrast, the assembly district was 61 percent racial minority. The Hasidic population belonged to the racial majority. In 1974, New York sought to enhance the voting efficacy of Kings County's racial-minority population. This resulted in a redistricting plan that considered racial factors. The racial majority comprised 65 percent of Kings County's population in 1974. The racial majority constituted a majority in 70 of the reapportioned districts. The plan did not increase the total of majority-minority districts. Bedford-Stuyvesant's Hasidic community underwent division between two senate and two assembly districts. In one of these assembly districts, the majority-minority population increased to 65 percent. The United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh (plaintiff) alleged that this diluted their votes.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

Concurrence (Brennan, J.)

Dissent (Burger, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership