Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

United Properties Limited Co. v. Walgreen Properties, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals
82 P.3d 535 (2003)


Facts

Walgreen Properties, Inc. (Walgreen) (defendant) leased property to United Properties Limited Company (UPL) (plaintiff). The lease agreement provided that the rent for the property was $44,640 per year and that the term expired on December 31, 1999. UPL had the option to extend the lease for three additional five-year periods. UPL spent over $1.2 million on capital improvements to the property and subleased portions of the property to other businesses. The sublease payments to UPL were $263,500 per year. Under the lease, UPL was required to give written notice of intent to renew by September 30, 1999. UPL forgot to give notice, and on November 8, 1999, Walgreen notified UPL that the option to renew had expired. UPL attempted to renew the following day by sending a written notice, but Walgreen refused to renew the lease. UPL sued Walgreen, seeking a declaratory judgment that the late renewal notice was effective. The trial court granted judgment to UPL, and Walgreen appealed to the New Mexico Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Pickard, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Castillo, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.