Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

United States ex rel. Mikes v. Straus

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
274 F.3d 687 (2001)


Facts

Dr. Marc Straus, Dr. Jeffrey Ambinder, and Dr. Eliot Friedman, (the Physicians) (defendants) hired Dr. Patricia Mikes (plaintiff). Mikes was board-certified in pulmonology, the specialty of detecting lung conditions. Mikes discussed with Straus her concerns about how the Physicians were conducting spirometry tests to detect asthma and emphysema conditions. A spirometry test required a patient to blow into a mouthpiece that provided physicians instant analysis of the volume and speed of the patient’s exhalation. Mikes claimed the spirometry tests were administered by insufficiently-trained personnel and the tests were not calibrated according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines. The ATS recommended daily calibration, which the Physicians were not doing. Three months later, the Physicians fired Mikes. In addition to retaliatory termination and unlawful withheld wages claims, Mikes filed a qui tam False Claims Act (FCA) action in federal court alleging that the Physicians had submitted false reimbursement requests to the federal government for the spirometry tests given to patients. Mikes claimed that the Physicians’ failure to calibrate the spirometers daily rendered the results so unreliable as to be “false” under the FCA. The United States government declined to intervene in the case. The district court granted the Physicians’ motion for summary judgment and Mikes appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Cardamone, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.