United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. A & S Manufacturing Co.

48 F.3d 131 (1995)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. A & S Manufacturing Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
48 F.3d 131 (1995)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

A & S Manufacturing Co. (A & S) (defendant) contracted with United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (Fidelity) (plaintiff), Federal Insurance Company (Federal) (defendant), and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford) (defendant) for liability insurance. After environmental contamination at A & S sites, which was covered by the insurance contracts, the Environmental Protection Agency sued A & S to recover cleanup costs. A & S brought the insurance companies into the case for indemnity purposes. In response, Fidelity filed a lawsuit against A & S, Federal, and Hartford, seeking a declaration of the rights and duties of each party. Because complete diversity existed among the parties, Fidelity filed the lawsuit in federal district court through diversity jurisdiction. A & S filed a similar lawsuit against Fidelity, Federal, and Hartford in New Jersey state court. A & S also moved to realign the parties in the federal case. The district court applied the principal-purpose test, realigning the three insurance companies as plaintiffs and A & S as the defendant in the federal case. With the parties realigned, complete diversity no longer existed between the plaintiffs and defendants because A & S and Federal were both New Jersey citizens. The district court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction. Fidelity appealed, arguing that the district court erred in using the principal-purpose test for realignment instead of the substantial-controversy test.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Butzner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership