United States Healthcare, Inc. v Healthsource, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
986 F.2d 589 (1993)
Healthsource, Inc. and Healthsource New Hampshire (Healthsource) (defendants) operated a successful HMO in New Hampshire. Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) combine health insurance and healthcare functions to provide low-cost healthcare alternatives. HMOs charge fixed premiums and provide medical services to subscribers. A typical HMO contracts with a group of doctors to provide the medical services. Healthsource contracted with approximately 25 percent of primary-care physicians in New Hampshire. United States Healthcare, Inc. (U.S. Healthcare) (plaintiff) was one of the largest HMOs in the United States. In 1989, U.S. Healthcare wanted to expand into New Hampshire. To create an incentive for Healthsource doctors to remain with Healthsource, Healthsource offered to pay doctors more if doctors agreed not to work for any other HMO. The optional exclusivity term provided an approximately 14 percent increase in pay in exchange for the doctor’s agreement not to work for another HMO. U.S. Healthcare sued Healthsource, arguing the exclusivity term in Healthsource’s contract violated the Sherman Act in two ways. First, U.S Healthcare argued that the exclusivity term was a group refusal to deal and a per se violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act. Second, U.S. Healthcare argued that, under a rule-of-reason analysis, the exclusivity term foreclosed competition in the market for HMO services in New Hampshire. The district court judge found no Sherman Act violation. U.S Healthcare appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Boudin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.