United States—Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services
Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization
WT/DS285/AB/R (April 20, 2005)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) establishes rules regulating the measures that World Trade Organization (WTO) nations can implement to affect trade in services. Under the GATS, WTO members can make commitments in various service sectors, which are outlined in each nation’s GATS “schedule.” GATS Article XVI provided that a nation could not restrict trade in services unless the restrictions were included in the nation’s schedule. W/120 and the 1993 Scheduling Guidelines were documents issued to offer guidance on how schedules should be created. In its schedule, the United States (defendant) made commitments in Subsector 10.D to “other recreational services (except sporting).” The United States did not list any cross-border limitations under this commitment. In 2004, Antigua (plaintiff) initiated dispute proceedings against the United States. A WTO panel ruled that U.S. laws forbidding internet gambling, including the Interstate Wire Act, Illegal Gambling Business Act, and Interstate Horseracing Act, violated the GATS. The United States appealed, arguing (1) that it had made no specific commitments to trade in gambling, which was included under “sporting services,” and (2) that, alternatively, the regulations fell within the scope of the GATS Article XIV(a) exception, which provided that as long as the measures were not applied in an unjustifiably discriminatory manner, nations were permitted to implement measures that were necessary to protect public morals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.