United States of America v. An Original Manuscript . . . Bearing the Signature of Junipero Serra, Located at Sotheby's, . . . New York

1999 U.S. Dist. Lexis 1859, 1999 WL 97894 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States of America v. An Original Manuscript … Bearing the Signature of Junipero Serra, Located at Sotheby’s, … New York

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
1999 U.S. Dist. Lexis 1859, 1999 WL 97894 (1999)

KL

Facts

A manuscript bearing the signature of a famous priest was contained within a collection of documents in the Mexican National Archives (archives) in Mexico City, Mexico. An unknown person removed the manuscript from the collection without permission and sold it at a flea market. The buyer took the manuscript to the United States and eventually sold it to Dana Toft (defendant), who collected valuable documents. Toft met the seller in a hotel room and paid $16,000 for the manuscript. He did not ask for any authentication documents or other proof that the seller rightfully owned the manuscript. Toft decided to auction the manuscript at Sotheby’s auction house in New York. A rare-manuscript dealer notified the archives that the manuscript was for sale, prompting an investigation by the archives’ staff, which determined that the manuscript had been removed from the archives’ collection. As proof that the manuscript belonged to the archives, staff presented a microfilm record of the full collection, showing that the manuscript had been included in the archives’ files. The United States (plaintiff) brought a forfeiture action against Toft in federal court under the Cultural Property Implementation Act, which prohibited the importation into the United States of any cultural property identified as within the inventory of another country’s museums. The United States filed a motion for summary judgment on its forfeiture claim, supporting the motion with the microfilm evidence and expert evidence from an art-fraud specialist who concluded after a comparison of the manuscript and the archives’ microfilm that the manuscript was the same one the archives reported missing. Toft claimed that he was an innocent purchaser of the manuscript, a recognized defense to a forfeiture action.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Preska, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership