United States of America v. Bryan Dale Wallace (plea agreement)
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
No. 1:17-CR-337 (2017)
Bryan Wallace (defendant) was charged in federal district court with federal conspiracy violations and negotiated a cooperation-based plea agreement with the United States (plaintiff). The agreement included the statutory penalties for the conspiracy charges and acknowledged that the district court ultimately would decide Wallace’s sentence by considering the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The facts supporting Wallace’s conviction for conspiracy were described in detail in the agreement. Wallace waived his trial rights and other rights afforded to a criminal defendant, such as the right to appeal, in exchange for possible dismissal of the charges after sentencing and a guarantee that the government would not add additional criminal charges based on the facts giving rise to the conspiracy charge. The agreement depended on Wallace’s cooperation with the government and law enforcement. Under the agreement, Wallace was obligated to disclose information to law enforcement, testify in court, and report any contact from his criminal associates. In exchange, the government agreed not to use any truthful statements made by Wallace against him, subject to certain exceptions. The agreement asserted that at Wallace’s sentencing hearing, the government could elect to exercise its discretion to inform the court of Wallace’s cooperation and seek a downward departure from the statutory sentencing guidelines. The agreement stated that only the government could request the downward departure and that the sentencing court would then decide whether to grant the downward departure.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.