United States of America v. Kyle R. Jones, Thayde L. Jones, and Robert Gevara
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
607 F.2d 269 (1979)

- Written by Kelli Lanski, JD
Facts
Kyle R. Jones, Thayde L. Jones, and Robert Gevara (collectively, Jones-Gevara) (defendants) were charged with violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 1361 and 641, general statutes criminalizing theft of and malicious mischief committed against government property. The charges stemmed from Jones-Gevara stealing Indian artifacts from a national forest and damaging the Indian ruins in the forest by using picks and shovels to dig up the artifacts they stole. Jones-Gevara moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing that Congress intended the Antiquities Act of 1906, which prohibited the unlawful acquisition of objects of antiquity, to be the sole means of prosecuting their conduct, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals had recently declared that act unconstitutional, meaning there was no statute under which they could be prosecuted. The lower court granted the motion to dismiss, and the United States (plaintiff) appealed, arguing that the act’s congressional history was silent as to its impact on 18 U.S.C. §§ 1361 and 641, meaning the United States could elect to prosecute Jones-Gevara under those laws.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tang, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.