United States of America v. Nzelo Chinedu Okafor

285 F.3d 842 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States of America v. Nzelo Chinedu Okafor

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
285 F.3d 842 (2002)

Facts

Nzelo Chinedu Okafor (defendant) was on a layover at Los Angeles International Airport while traveling between Brazil and Japan. During the layover, Okafor exited the plane and went to a lounge. A United States Customs Service (customs) (defendant) official was screening passengers entering the lounge. Based on Okafor’s inconsistent answers relating to his travels, the official became suspicious and directed Okafor to secondary screening. There, customs officials noted that Okafor’s bag was heavier than it should have been. An X-ray scan revealed a secret compartment in the bag. Using a metal probe, the officials cut a hole in the bag and extracted a white substance that tested positive for cocaine. Okafor was criminally charged. During the trial, Okafor moved to suppress the evidence collected by customs, stating that the use of the X-ray machine and cutting into his bag were unlawful, non-routine searches. The trial court denied Okafor’s motion, and Okafor was found guilty at trial. Okafor appealed the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gould, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership