United States of America v. Nzelo Chinedu Okafor
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
285 F.3d 842 (2002)
- Written by Gonzalo Rodriguez, JD
Facts
Nzelo Chinedu Okafor (defendant) was on a layover at Los Angeles International Airport while traveling between Brazil and Japan. During the layover, Okafor exited the plane and went to a lounge. A United States Customs Service (customs) (defendant) official was screening passengers entering the lounge. Based on Okafor’s inconsistent answers relating to his travels, the official became suspicious and directed Okafor to secondary screening. There, customs officials noted that Okafor’s bag was heavier than it should have been. An X-ray scan revealed a secret compartment in the bag. Using a metal probe, the officials cut a hole in the bag and extracted a white substance that tested positive for cocaine. Okafor was criminally charged. During the trial, Okafor moved to suppress the evidence collected by customs, stating that the use of the X-ray machine and cutting into his bag were unlawful, non-routine searches. The trial court denied Okafor’s motion, and Okafor was found guilty at trial. Okafor appealed the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gould, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.