From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
359 F.3d 554 (2004)
Congress enacted the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Act), 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., to encourage competition in the telecommunications market. The Act gave the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant) the authority to require incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) to unbundle network elements for use by other carriers, including new market entrants known as competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs). Section 251(d)(2) of the Act gave the FCC the discretion to determine which elements to unbundle, provided that the FCC considered whether a decision not to unbundle would impair a CLEC’s ability to offer a particular service. After the FCC’s initial attempts to apply § 251(d)(2) were struck down by the courts, the FCC issued an order adopting a new approach that attempted to base unbundling criteria on a variety of specific market characteristics. Under the order, the FCC subdelegated to state regulatory commissions the authority to make specific determinations about whether CLECs were impaired by a lack of unbundling in specific areas. The FCC’s order gave the states the discretion to define the relevant markets and conduct necessary analyses. The order also provided for FCC review of state decisions, but did not specify when or if the FCC had to respond. The United States Telecom Association and other ILECs (plaintiffs) petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review, challenging the order on the basis that the FCC’s subdelegation to the state commissions was unlawful.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.