United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
855 F.3d 381 (2017)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
In 2015, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant) issued an order classifying Internet-service providers (ISPs) as telecommunications carriers subject to regulation under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934. As part of the order, the FCC promulgated net-neutrality rules, under which ISPs were prohibited from blocking or throttling lawful internet traffic. The rules applied to only ISPs holding themselves out as indiscriminate conduits for internet content. The rules did not apply to any ISP that advertised and disclosed to subscribers that it was providing them filtered internet content. The United States Telecom Association, Alamo Broadband, and other organizations representing ISPs (plaintiffs) petitioned for review of the order. A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the order. Alamo Broadband filed a petition for rehearing en banc, arguing that the order compelled ISPs’ speech in violation of the First Amendment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Dissent (Kavanaugh, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.