Logourl black

United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey

United States Supreme Court
431 U.S. 1 (1977)


Facts

In 1962, New York and New Jersey adopted laws prohibiting the use of toll revenues from the Port Authorities of those states from being used to subsidize railroad passenger service. The purpose of the laws was to assure those holding Port Authority bonds that the toll funds would remain available to pay that debt. In 1974, during the energy crisis of the 1970’s, New York and New Jersey adopted additional laws to repeal the earlier prohibition and to permit the use of toll funds to improve rail transit. United States Trust Co. (plaintiff) brought suit in New Jersey state court against New Jersey (defendant) on the grounds that a New Jersey statute permitting the use of toll funds for rail transit violated the Contract Clause of the Constitution. The trial court upheld the repeal as a valid exercise of state police power, and the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed. United States Trust Co. appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Concurrence (Burger, C.J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Brennan, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 91,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,498 briefs - keyed to 168 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now