United States v. $61,200.00 in U.S. Currency, More or Less

805 F. Supp. 2d 682 (2010)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. $61,200.00 in U.S. Currency, More or Less

United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
805 F. Supp. 2d 682 (2010)

  • Written by Patrick Speice, JD

Facts

Brian Szymczak was pulled over for a routine traffic stop in Iowa while driving his van back to California following a trip to Michigan. The police officer smelled marijuana and asked Szymczak whether marijuana or large amounts of cash were in the van. After Szymczak initially denied having either, Szymczak admitted having several marijuana cigarettes and approximately $60,000 in the van. Szymczak claimed that the cash was his life savings earned during a lengthy career as a telephone repairman—although Szymczak ultimately only produced limited tax returns to support that claim—and that the cash was in the van because Szymczak wished to purchase a safe in Michigan, but was unable to do so. Szymczak consented to a search of the van, and the police officer found more than $60,000 in small bills in a tool bag and several sealed plastic packets on the van’s floor and hidden in the bottom of a cereal box. The officer also found marijuana in various places throughout the van, some of which was sealed in plastic packets, and paraphernalia for consuming marijuana. Marijuana residue, paraphernalia for consuming and selling marijuana, and two firearms were subsequently found in Szymczak’s storage unit in Michigan. Szymczak pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance. The federal government (plaintiff) filed an in rem forfeiture action against the cash found in Szymczak’s van (defendant) and moved for summary judgment, alleging that the cash was connected to unlawful drug trafficking. Szymczak opposed the government’s forfeiture claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jarvey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership