United States v. Agrawal

726 F.3d 235 (2013)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Agrawal

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
726 F.3d 235 (2013)

AR

Facts

Samarth Agrawal (defendant) worked at Société Générale, a French bank, and had access to the bank’s confidential computer code that it used to make high-frequency securities trades. Agrawal took a new job at Tower Research Capital and agreed to build a similar system for Tower. To do so, Agrawal printed out thousands of pages of Société’s code and took the pages to his home. The day Agrawal was to begin working for Tower, he was arrested. Agrawal was then convicted under the Economic Espionage Act for stealing Société’s trade secrets. Agrawal appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Agrawal argued that he could not be convicted under the act, because the act only applied to trade secrets that were “related to or included in a product that is produced for or placed in interstate or foreign commerce” and Société’s code was never intended to be sold or licensed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Raggi, J.)

Dissent (Pooler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership