United States v. Ahmad

101 F.3d 386 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Ahmad

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
101 F.3d 386 (1996)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Ahmad (defendant) purchased a gas station. Some time later, Ahmad discovered that an underground gasoline tank was leaking, allowing water to enter the tank and preventing Ahmad from selling gasoline from the tank. A tank-testing company advised Ahmad that the tank had to be emptied for the leak to be repaired. Ahmad rented a water pump and pumped out the tank. Some of the gasoline ran into a sewer system storm drain that emptied into a creek. Some gasoline was discharged into a manhole that entered the city sewage-treatment plant, causing an explosion hazard that required evacuation of the sewage-treatment plant and two nearby schools. Investigators traced the source of the gasoline to the manhole and Ahmad’s gas station. Ahmad was indicted for violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA). At trial, he maintained that his discharge of gasoline was not “knowing” because he believed he was discharging water. Ahmad was convicted. On appeal, Ahmad argued that the statutory language “knowingly violates” required the government (plaintiff) to prove not just that Ahmad knew the nature of his acts and performed them intentionally, but that he had knowledge with respect to each element of the offense, including whether what he discharged was a pollutant.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership