United States v. Alabama
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
691 F.3d 1269 (2012)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
In 2011, the State of Alabama (defendant) passed a comprehensive set of legislation that attempted to discourage illegal immigration in the state through a number of different mechanisms. Among its provisions, the law created new state crimes related to illegal immigration, required law-enforcement officials and schools to determine the immigration status of individuals in certain situations, prohibited illegal immigrants from seeking any type of license from the state, and prohibited state courts from enforcing contracts to which an illegal immigrant was a party. The United States (plaintiff) sued the state in federal court, seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent enforcement of the law on the grounds that it was an impermissible attempt to regulate immigration and therefore preempted by federal law. The district court granted the injunction in part and denied it in part, holding that certain provisions of the law were facially invalid and therefore should be enjoined. Both the United States and Alabama appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wilson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.