United States v. Alexander

326 F.2d 736 (1964)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Alexander

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
326 F.2d 736 (1964)

Facts

Ernest Alexander (defendant) was found with a check in his possession that was made payable to someone else. Alexander was charged with possession of a check knowing that it had been stolen from a mailbox. The postal inspector copied the original check via a thermofax machine, but the payee’s name and address did not come through on the copy. The inspector used the information on the original check to type this missing information on the copy. The postal inspector then gave the original check to its intended recipient for cashing. At trial, the contents of the inspector’s check copy and testimony about the original check’s contents were used to link the check to a mail theft and establish evidence of Alexander’s alleged crime. Alexander was convicted and appealed, arguing that the copy of the check and the testimony about the check’s contents should have been excluded under the best-evidence rule.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Boreman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership