From our private database of 35,800+ case briefs...
United States v. Alfisi
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
308 F.3d 144 (2002)
Mark Alfisi (defendant) was a produce wholesaler. Alfisi purchased produce from commercial brokers. If a wholesaler claimed that produce did not meet a certain contractual standard, a United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) inspection could be called to verify the quality and condition of the produce. USDA inspectors routinely accepted money from wholesalers to downgrade their quality assessment of produce so wholesalers could pay less. William Cashin was arrested for accepting money as a USDA inspector. Alfisi was arrested and charged with bribery, paying an unlawful gratuity, and conspiracy to commit bribery. At trial, Cashin testified that Alfisi paid Cashin $50 per inspection to falsely downgrade his report. Sometimes the produce was legitimately poor quality, and thus the report was truthful. Alfisi argued that he was a victim of extortion by the USDA officials and that he paid Cashin only to make certain that Cashin performed inspections properly. Some evidence indicated that some of Cashin’s inspections were accurate. The jury convicted Alfisi of seven counts of bribery, six counts of paying unlawful gratuities, and one count of conspiracy to commit bribery, and Alfisi was sentenced to a prison term of one year and one day. Alfisi appealed his conviction to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, arguing that the jury should not have been permitted to convict him for bribery if Alfisi paid Cashin to perform Cashin’s job honestly.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Winter, J.)
Dissent (Sack, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 620,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 620,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.