United States v. Algernon Blair, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
479 F.2d 638 (4th Cir. 1973)
Subcontractor Coastal Steel Erectors, Inc.(Coastal) (plaintiff) brought suit under the Miller Act in the name of the United States against Algernon Blair (Blair) (defendant). Blair had entered into a contract to construct a hospital and had contracted with Coastal for steel erection and equipment supply. Coastal supplied its own cranes for handling and placing steel. Blair refused to pay for crane rental, claiming it was not obligated to do so, and Coastal stopped work. Blair then hired a new subcontractor to complete the job, and Coastal brought suit to recover for labor and equipment furnished. The court denied Coastal recovery on the ground that it would have lost more than was due to it if it had completed the project, and Coastal appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Craven, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.