From our private database of 35,800+ case briefs...
United States v. Allen
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
864 F.3d 63 (2017)
Anthony Allen and Anthony Conti (defendants) were United Kingdom (UK) citizens and residents. Both men were former bank employees who had been involved with their bank’s London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) submission process. At some point, UK authorities discovered rampant LIBOR manipulation and began investigating the parties involved. Several years after they left their jobs with the bank, Allen and Conti were among the persons being investigated in relation to the LIBOR scandal. The UK enforcement authority, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), interviewed Allen and Conti as part of its investigation. Under UK law, Allen and Conti would face imprisonment if they had refused to testify. The testimonies of Allen and Conti were then provided to a former coworker of the two men, Paul Robson, after the FCA initiated an enforcement action against Robson. Robson annotated and took notes on the testimonies of his former coworkers. The FCA dropped the case against Robson soon after. The United States Department of Justice then initiated a case against Robson and secured a prompt guilty plea from him in addition to a promise to cooperate. As a result, Robson provided information, based in part on the testimonies that Allen and Conti had provided to the FCA, to an American grand jury. Robson’s information formed the basis for a grand-jury indictment of Allen and Conti for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, among other counts. Robson also testified at trial to the jury that convicted Allen and Conti. Allen and Conti appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cabranes, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 620,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 620,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.