Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

United States v. Allen J.

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
127 F.3d 1292 (10th Cir. 1997)


Facts

Allen J. (defendant) was charged in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico with the sexual assault of a minor victim. At trial, the prosecution called the victim, who was 13 years old, to testify. Allen J. objected to the victim’s testimony, claiming that the victim suffered from mild mental retardation and thus was not competent to testify. Before asking substantive questions, the prosecution asked the victim a number of introductory questions about the truth generally, as well as about the oath she took, including: (1) whether she understood that she had promised to tell the truth, (2) whether she knew the difference between the truth and a lie, and (3) whether she knew that she would be punished if she told a lie in court. The victim answered each of these questions affirmatively. The district judge then permitted the victim to testify without a competency hearing. However, during her testimony, the victim had difficulty answering some questions. The victim also gave incorrect answers to other questions, including her own age. Allen J. was convicted by the district court, and he appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Brorby, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.