United States v. Alvarado

808 F.3d 474 (2015)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Alvarado

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
808 F.3d 474 (2015)

RW

Facts

The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Fausto Aguero Alvarado (defendant) for conspiring with traffickers in illegal drugs. The federal district court trial evidence established that Alvarado signed a series of short-term contracts with federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents to report on drug operations in several Latin American countries. Like all the agreements, Alvarado's August one-year contract to work undercover in Colombia contained a clause specifying that Alvarado could be prosecuted for any illegal activity not ordered by his DEA handler, Agent Romain. Four months into the contract, Romain bluntly told Alvarado to leave Colombia because Romain no longer wanted to work with him. Alvarado remained in Colombia, and for the next 16 months he was an active member of a Colombian drug-trafficking cartel. Not once during this time did Alvarado attempt to pass information on the cartel's operations to Romain or any other DEA agent. A secret government informant's reports eventually led to Alvarado's arrest. Alvarado moved for a jury instruction on the public-authority defense, arguing that Romain told him that the DEA contract clause prohibiting Alvarado from taking illegal action on his own was a mere formality, that the DEA had the ability to track his activities through wiretaps and GPS, and that the contract gave Alvarado general permission to engage in drug trafficking until the DEA formally revoked that permission. The judge denied Alvarado's motion, and the jury found him guilty. Alvarado appealed to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Carnes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership