United States v. Alvarez

809 Fed. Appx. 562 (2020)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Alvarez

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
809 Fed. Appx. 562 (2020)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD

Facts

Mauricio Alvarez (defendant) captained the Miami Vice, a 91-foot yacht offered for commercial charters for hire. United States Coast Guard (USCG) regulations required such charters to have a USCG-licensed captain who has taken a USCG-approved captain’s-license course. The course covers safety information including steps that must be taken before starting the vessel’s engines, such as conducting a headcount of all passengers. Alvarez was unlicensed and never took the USCG captain’s course. Alvarez knew of the licensing requirement and was even cited for failure to have one. During a charter, Alvarez navigated to an island and beached the Miami Vice instead of anchoring. C.M., R.M.P., and Alvarez all swam in the water behind the yacht. Alvarez raised the dive ladder and prepared to leave the island but did not inform C.M. and R.M.P., who jumped back into the water. Alvarez did not loudly announce that the yacht would be leaving immediately, check to ensure that everyone was onboard, or tell C.M. and R.M.P. to not get back in the water. Without taking the steps of a reasonable captain such as checking behind the yacht, establishing a rear lookout, or performing a headcount, Alvarez started the engines and placed the yacht in reverse. R.M.P. was pulled underneath the yacht and killed by the propeller. Alvarez tested positive for cocaine. A federal grand jury indicted Alvarez for negligently causing the death of R.M.P. in violation of the Seaman’s Manslaughter Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1115. Alvarez pleaded guilty, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. Alvarez was sentenced to 33 months’ incarceration. Alvarez appealed, arguing § 1115 unconstitutionally criminalized simple negligence, was void for vagueness and overbroad, and violated his presumption of innocence and his right to remain silent.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership