United States v. Antelope
United States Supreme Court
430 U.S. 641, 97 S.Ct. 1395, 51 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977)
- Written by Nathan Benedict, JD
Facts
Gabriel Francis Antelope and others (Antelope) (defendants), enrolled Coeur d’Alene Indians, robbed and killed Emma Johnson, a non-Indian, on the Coeur d’Alene Indian Reservation in the state of Idaho. The United States (plaintiff) tried and convicted Antelope of felony murder in federal court under the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1153. A non-Indian charged with the murder of a non-Indian on an Indian reservation would have been tried in Idaho state court under Idaho law, not federal law. Unlike federal law, Idaho did not have a felony-murder statute. Conviction of first-degree murder in state court would have required proof of premeditation and deliberation. Antelope argued that his conviction violated the equal-protection provisions implicit in the Fifth Amendment because the government could convict him of first-degree murder without proving elements that would have been necessary to convict a non-Indian of the same offense under state law. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the conviction, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.