United States v. Antelope

430 U.S. 641, 97 S.Ct. 1395, 51 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Antelope

United States Supreme Court
430 U.S. 641, 97 S.Ct. 1395, 51 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977)

Facts

Gabriel Francis Antelope and others (Antelope) (defendants), enrolled Coeur d’Alene Indians, robbed and killed Emma Johnson, a non-Indian, on the Coeur d’Alene Indian Reservation in the state of Idaho. The United States (plaintiff) tried and convicted Antelope of felony murder in federal court under the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1153. A non-Indian charged with the murder of a non-Indian on an Indian reservation would have been tried in Idaho state court under Idaho law, not federal law. Unlike federal law, Idaho did not have a felony-murder statute. Conviction of first-degree murder in state court would have required proof of premeditation and deliberation. Antelope argued that his conviction violated the equal-protection provisions implicit in the Fifth Amendment because the government could convict him of first-degree murder without proving elements that would have been necessary to convict a non-Indian of the same offense under state law. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the conviction, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership