United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.
United States Supreme Court
311 U.S. 377 (1940)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Appalachian Electric Power Company (Appalachian) (defendant) began building a hydroelectric dam on the New River in Virginia without a federal permit. The Federal Water Power Act of 1920 authorized the Federal Power Commission to license dam projects. Anyone intending to build a dam had to file a declaration with the commission. If the dam would not affect interstate or foreign commerce, the commission approved construction; otherwise, a license was required. After Appalachian’s predecessor declared intent to build the dam, the commission recommended that Appalachian apply for a license. The commission found the New River was nonnavigable as defined under the 1920 act but that the dam would affect interstate and foreign commerce interests. The commission provided a standard-form license that Appalachian declined because the conditions concerning rates, accounts, and eventual acquisition of the dam were unrelated to navigation. Appalachian insisted the commission lacked jurisdiction over the project but offered to accept a “minor-part” license with only those conditions related to navigation. Appalachian sued to keep the commission from interfering with the project, but the court dismissed. Meanwhile, the commission found the New River navigable. Appalachian nonetheless began construction. The federal government (plaintiff) sued to stop construction without a license or require removal of the dam. The federal court found the New River nonnavigable, that the dam would not obstruct navigation or affect interstate commerce, and that the commission could not require Appalachian to obtain a license or impose conditions unrelated to navigability. After the circuit court affirmed, the Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reed, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.